🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, mandating governments to develop laws and support services to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar discussions in additional member states