🔗 Share this article

American government attorneys have claimed that a Libyan man willingly confessed to taking part in terrorist acts targeting US citizens, comprising the 1988 Pan Am Flight 103 bombing and an aborted conspiracy to kill a US politician using a rigged coat.

Confession Details

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is said to have confessed his role in the killing of 270 people when Flight 103 was brought down over the Scottish town of Lockerbie, during interviewing in a Libyan prison in the year 2012.

Identified as the suspect, the elderly man has stated that multiple disguised men pressured him to deliver the confession after menacing him and his family.

His lawyers are attempting to stop it from being utilized as proof in his trial in DC next year.

Courtroom Conflict

In response, attorneys from the American justice department have stated they can prove in the courtroom that the admission was "unforced, credible and accurate."

The existence of the suspect's purported admission was initially disclosed in 2020, when the United States declared it was charging him with constructing and priming the IED used on Pan Am 103.

Defendant's Allegations

The family man is charged of being a former colonel in Libyan intelligence service and has been in American confinement since 2022.

He has stated innocent to the allegations and is expected to stand trial at the District Court for the the capital in spring.

The defendant's legal team are attempting to prevent the trial from being informed about the confession and have presented a motion asking for it to be suppressed.

They contend it was acquired under pressure following the overthrow which toppled the former dictator in the early 2010s.

Purported Coercion

They assert ex- members of the leader's government were being singled out with wrongful deaths, kidnappings and mistreatment when the suspect was seized from his residence by weapon-carrying persons the next time.

He was transported to an informal holding location where other inmates were purportedly assaulted and abused and was alone in a tiny room when several masked individuals handed him a one document of documentation.

His legal representatives said its manually written information commenced with an instruction that he was to confess to the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing and a separate violent act.

Major Extremist Events

The suspect claims he was ordered to remember what it said about the events and repeat it when he was interrogated by someone else the subsequent morning.

Fearing for his well-being and that of his family, he stated he felt he had no option but to obey.

In their answer to the defendant's motion, legal counsel from the US Department of Justice have declared the judge was being petitioned to suppress "extremely significant evidence" of the suspect's culpability in "multiple significant terrorist attacks targeting American people."

Government Counterarguments

They assert the defendant's version of occurrences is implausible and untrue, and contend that the contents of the admission can be corroborated by trustworthy external evidence gathered over numerous years.

The prosecutors claim the defendant and additional former members of the former leader's secret service were detained in a covert detention facility run by a armed group when they were questioned by an knowledgeable Libya's investigator.

They contend that in the chaos of the post-uprising period, the location was "the safest place" for Mas'ud and the other agents, accounting for the violence and resistance sentiment prevailing at the time.

Investigation Details

Based to the law enforcement official who interrogated the suspect, the location was "properly managed", the prisoners were not bound and there were no signs of coercion or intimidation.

The investigator has stated that over multiple sessions, a composed and well suspect explained his participation in the attacks of the aircraft.

The federal authorities has also stated he had acknowledged constructing a bomb which detonated in a Berlin nightclub in the mid-1980s, causing the deaths of three persons, including multiple American military personnel, and harming many more.

Additional Claims

He is also alleged to have described his role in an attempt on the lives of an unidentified American foreign minister at a official ceremony in the Asian country.

The defendant is reported to have explained that a person travelling the US politician was wearing a rigged overcoat.

It was the defendant's assignment to activate the bomb but he opted not to proceed after finding out that the individual wearing the garment did not understand he was on a deadly operation.

He chose "not to push the device" despite his superior in the intelligence service being alongside at the moment and asking what was {going on|happening|occurring